https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279012 The High Court held that the document Exhibit B, signed by four out of five trustees, was valid and binding as there was no evidence to support the lower courts' finding that all trustees were required to execute it. Regarding the payment made to two trustees without authorization from others, the Court ruled that the trustees were not discharged from the plaintiff's claim. The appeal was allowed, costs were awarded to the plaintiff, and a decree was granted in favor of the plaintiff, with a provision for property sale in case of non-payment within six months. en-us Fri, 30 Jul 1915 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:26:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279012 The High Court held that the document Exhibit B, signed by four out of five trustees, was valid and binding as there was no evidence to support the lower courts' finding that all trustees were required to execute it. Regarding the payment made to two trustees without authorization from others, the Court ruled that the trustees were not discharged from the plaintiff's claim. The appeal was allowed, costs were awarded to the plaintiff, and a decree was granted in favor of the plaintiff, with a provision for property sale in case of non-payment within six months. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Jul 1915 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279012