<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (10) TMI 54 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17042</link>
    <description>The court quashed the orders and directed the second respondent to afford the petitioner an opportunity to show cause against the rejection of the loss returns for the years 1986-87 and 1987-88. The assessments for the years 1986-87, 1987-88, and 1988-89 were to be completed after considering the objections raised by the petitioner within two months from the date of receipt of the judgment. The Original Petition was allowed to the extent specified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:37:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (10) TMI 54 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17042</link>
      <description>The court quashed the orders and directed the second respondent to afford the petitioner an opportunity to show cause against the rejection of the loss returns for the years 1986-87 and 1987-88. The assessments for the years 1986-87, 1987-88, and 1988-89 were to be completed after considering the objections raised by the petitioner within two months from the date of receipt of the judgment. The Original Petition was allowed to the extent specified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>