<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1568 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375941</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT HYDERABAD ruled in favor of the appellant, holding them eligible for exemption under notification 24/2004-ST for vocational training institutes. The Tribunal determined that the animation training provided was not computer training but specialized in animation software, exempting the appellant from service tax. Additionally, the Tribunal considered the animation movie production as a potential export of service, exempting the appellant from service tax, interest, and penalties. The Tribunal did not address the request to treat amounts received as cum-tax values but set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1568 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375941</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT HYDERABAD ruled in favor of the appellant, holding them eligible for exemption under notification 24/2004-ST for vocational training institutes. The Tribunal determined that the animation training provided was not computer training but specialized in animation software, exempting the appellant from service tax. Additionally, the Tribunal considered the animation movie production as a potential export of service, exempting the appellant from service tax, interest, and penalties. The Tribunal did not address the request to treat amounts received as cum-tax values but set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>