<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1564 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375937</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to determine the exclusion of reimbursable expenses from the taxable value. Penalties imposed under sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were set aside entirely due to the appellant&#039;s good faith belief that their activity did not fall under Business Auxiliary Service, requiring further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 06:59:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1564 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375937</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to determine the exclusion of reimbursable expenses from the taxable value. Penalties imposed under sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 were set aside entirely due to the appellant&#039;s good faith belief that their activity did not fall under Business Auxiliary Service, requiring further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>