<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1557 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375930</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the liability for Central Excise duty and penalty under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, did not apply to clearances to Special Economic Zones categorized as exports. The judgment emphasized the significance of considering the provisions of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, in interpreting the rules governing such transactions, leading to the decision to set aside the imposed liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1557 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375930</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the liability for Central Excise duty and penalty under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, did not apply to clearances to Special Economic Zones categorized as exports. The judgment emphasized the significance of considering the provisions of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, in interpreting the rules governing such transactions, leading to the decision to set aside the imposed liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>