https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375927 The Tribunal decided to restore the appeal due to lack of notice and procedural irregularities. Despite opposition citing potential precedent implications, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of justice and fairness, ordering a fresh hearing by a different bench to ensure transparency and adherence to due process. The decision aimed to uphold the integrity of the judicial system and prevent any perception of bias or procedural lapses, highlighting the significance of diligence expected from authorized representatives and the limits beyond which cause for restoration does not suffice. en-us Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Mar 2020 14:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375927 The Tribunal decided to restore the appeal due to lack of notice and procedural irregularities. Despite opposition citing potential precedent implications, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of justice and fairness, ordering a fresh hearing by a different bench to ensure transparency and adherence to due process. The decision aimed to uphold the integrity of the judicial system and prevent any perception of bias or procedural lapses, highlighting the significance of diligence expected from authorized representatives and the limits beyond which cause for restoration does not suffice. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375927