<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1552 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375925</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was treated as admissible on structures and angles used in fabrication and laying the foundation of capital goods because they were regarded as accessories to the capital goods and therefore qualified as inputs under Rule 2(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The denial of credit was held unsustainable on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1552 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375925</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was treated as admissible on structures and angles used in fabrication and laying the foundation of capital goods because they were regarded as accessories to the capital goods and therefore qualified as inputs under Rule 2(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The denial of credit was held unsustainable on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>