<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1551 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375924</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the orders of the lower authorities were upheld, confirming the demand of duty, imposition of penalty, and recovery of interest. The Tribunal found that the appellants&#039; practices were intended to evade duty, justifying the extended period for demand and the associated penalties and interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 06:58:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1551 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375924</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed, and the orders of the lower authorities were upheld, confirming the demand of duty, imposition of penalty, and recovery of interest. The Tribunal found that the appellants&#039; practices were intended to evade duty, justifying the extended period for demand and the associated penalties and interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>