<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1549 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375922</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the dropping of proceedings initiated by a show-cause notice. The case involved a demand of duty on clearance of goods into DTA by a 100% EOU, with issues concerning exemption from payment of SAD. The Tribunal upheld the decision, citing past decisions and case laws to support the conclusion that the demand did not stand on merits. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the dropping of proceedings by the Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 06:58:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1549 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375922</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the dropping of proceedings initiated by a show-cause notice. The case involved a demand of duty on clearance of goods into DTA by a 100% EOU, with issues concerning exemption from payment of SAD. The Tribunal upheld the decision, citing past decisions and case laws to support the conclusion that the demand did not stand on merits. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the dropping of proceedings by the Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>