<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1548 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375921</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal could not apply equitable principles in a statutory appeal and emphasized adherence to statutory provisions. Regarding input tax credit for pre-registration purchases by a dealer, the Court found the Tribunal&#039;s rejection erroneous, especially if the dealer was an importer before registration. The Court allowed the revision, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision and reinstating the Assessing Officer&#039;s ruling. The Court ruled against the dealer on both issues, highlighting statutory limitations and the inapplicability of equitable principles. Each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 06:57:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1548 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375921</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Tribunal could not apply equitable principles in a statutory appeal and emphasized adherence to statutory provisions. Regarding input tax credit for pre-registration purchases by a dealer, the Court found the Tribunal&#039;s rejection erroneous, especially if the dealer was an importer before registration. The Court allowed the revision, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision and reinstating the Assessing Officer&#039;s ruling. The Court ruled against the dealer on both issues, highlighting statutory limitations and the inapplicability of equitable principles. Each party was directed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>