https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375920 The court found that the petitioner's misclassification issue was barred by constructive res judicata as authorities had provided ample opportunities for defense, concluding the petitioner could pursue statutory appellate remedies. Regarding the violation of principles of natural justice, the court held that the petitioner had not been denied any opportunity of hearing, and Ext.P11 demonstrated compliance with earlier judgments. The court instructed the petitioner to file an appeal within one month and deferred coercive steps. The court emphasized that its observations would not affect the petitioner's right to appeal before the appropriate appellate authority, ultimately disposing of the writ petition. en-us Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Feb 2019 06:57:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375920 The court found that the petitioner's misclassification issue was barred by constructive res judicata as authorities had provided ample opportunities for defense, concluding the petitioner could pursue statutory appellate remedies. Regarding the violation of principles of natural justice, the court held that the petitioner had not been denied any opportunity of hearing, and Ext.P11 demonstrated compliance with earlier judgments. The court instructed the petitioner to file an appeal within one month and deferred coercive steps. The court emphasized that its observations would not affect the petitioner's right to appeal before the appropriate appellate authority, ultimately disposing of the writ petition. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375920