<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1517 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279000</link>
    <description>Control cables supplied for wind power projects were treated as parts of wind operated electricity generators and were held eligible for exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-C.E. The tribunal relied on the notification entries and the CBEC clarification, issued with reference to the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, which stated that wind turbine controllers, nacelle controllers and control cables form part of wind operated electricity generators. Revenue&#039;s reliance on Supreme Court decisions was rejected because those rulings concerned a different notification. The denial of exemption was therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 06:57:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1517 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279000</link>
      <description>Control cables supplied for wind power projects were treated as parts of wind operated electricity generators and were held eligible for exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-C.E. The tribunal relied on the notification entries and the CBEC clarification, issued with reference to the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, which stated that wind turbine controllers, nacelle controllers and control cables form part of wind operated electricity generators. Revenue&#039;s reliance on Supreme Court decisions was rejected because those rulings concerned a different notification. The denial of exemption was therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>