<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1517 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279000</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner (A)&#039;s decision and ruling in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of flexible cables and connectors. The Tribunal determined that the power cables supplied for wind mill projects qualified for exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-C.E. as they were control cables integral to Wind Operated Electricity Generators. The Tribunal emphasized that the control cables were distinct from power cables, as per CBEC&#039;s clarification and Ministry of New and Renewable Energy&#039;s statement. The appellant successfully demonstrated entitlement to the exemption, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and granting of consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 06:57:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1517 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279000</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner (A)&#039;s decision and ruling in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of flexible cables and connectors. The Tribunal determined that the power cables supplied for wind mill projects qualified for exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-C.E. as they were control cables integral to Wind Operated Electricity Generators. The Tribunal emphasized that the control cables were distinct from power cables, as per CBEC&#039;s clarification and Ministry of New and Renewable Energy&#039;s statement. The appellant successfully demonstrated entitlement to the exemption, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and granting of consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=279000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>