<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1343 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278998</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition for the recall of the ex parte order, upholding its original decision. The reasons provided by the assessee were deemed inconsistent and unconvincing, with discrepancies in information and lack of clarity leading to the rejection of the recall request. Despite the assertion of illness as the cause for non-appearance, the Tribunal found contradictions in the statements made by the assessee, ultimately determining that the earlier order should stand. The Departmental Representative&#039;s opposition to the recall was considered, and the Tribunal concluded that the petition lacked merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 06:57:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1343 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278998</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition for the recall of the ex parte order, upholding its original decision. The reasons provided by the assessee were deemed inconsistent and unconvincing, with discrepancies in information and lack of clarity leading to the rejection of the recall request. Despite the assertion of illness as the cause for non-appearance, the Tribunal found contradictions in the statements made by the assessee, ultimately determining that the earlier order should stand. The Departmental Representative&#039;s opposition to the recall was considered, and the Tribunal concluded that the petition lacked merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>