<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1533 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375906</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT (Appeals)&#039;s decision to allow the assessee&#039;s claim of set off of brought forward losses for the assessment year 2009-10. The ITAT found that the conditions under Section 72A of the Income Tax Act were met, emphasizing compliance with Rule 9C and obtaining relaxation from the CBDT. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the benefit of set off of brought forward losses to the assessee and rejecting claims of non-compliance and improper admission of additional evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1533 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375906</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the Ld. CIT (Appeals)&#039;s decision to allow the assessee&#039;s claim of set off of brought forward losses for the assessment year 2009-10. The ITAT found that the conditions under Section 72A of the Income Tax Act were met, emphasizing compliance with Rule 9C and obtaining relaxation from the CBDT. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the benefit of set off of brought forward losses to the assessee and rejecting claims of non-compliance and improper admission of additional evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>