<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 590 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278992</link>
    <description>The court upheld the CBSE&#039;s requirement for private unaided schools to obtain a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the State Government for affiliation, deeming it valid and within the CBSE&#039;s autonomy. It ruled that the CBSE, as an autonomous body post-registration under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, is not bound by Central Government directions. Additionally, the court clarified that the High Court lacks the authority to legislate or deem an NOC granted if not decided within a specific period. As a result, the appeal was allowed, the previous judgment was overturned, and the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 18:06:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 590 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278992</link>
      <description>The court upheld the CBSE&#039;s requirement for private unaided schools to obtain a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the State Government for affiliation, deeming it valid and within the CBSE&#039;s autonomy. It ruled that the CBSE, as an autonomous body post-registration under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, is not bound by Central Government directions. Additionally, the court clarified that the High Court lacks the authority to legislate or deem an NOC granted if not decided within a specific period. As a result, the appeal was allowed, the previous judgment was overturned, and the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>