<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 71 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17025</link>
    <description>Section 80HHC(4) requires consideration of whether filing the prescribed auditor&#039;s report during assessment proceedings constitutes sufficient compliance, and whether the filing requirement is mandatory or directory. The Tribunal was directed to state the case and refer these two questions for the High Court&#039;s opinion, following allowance of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:35:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 71 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17025</link>
      <description>Section 80HHC(4) requires consideration of whether filing the prescribed auditor&#039;s report during assessment proceedings constitutes sufficient compliance, and whether the filing requirement is mandatory or directory. The Tribunal was directed to state the case and refer these two questions for the High Court&#039;s opinion, following allowance of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>