<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1683 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278986</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondent to execute the lease deed in favor of the petitioner company within six weeks, as control of the company had not shifted to outsiders due to share transfers, and unearned increase was not payable under the guidelines or lease conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:38:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1683 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278986</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondent to execute the lease deed in favor of the petitioner company within six weeks, as control of the company had not shifted to outsiders due to share transfers, and unearned increase was not payable under the guidelines or lease conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>