<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1524 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375897</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging assessment orders under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, the validity of Kerala GST transitional saving provisions, and the continued jurisdiction to levy and collect KVAT after GST was dismissed in light of the Kerala HC judgment in M/s. Sheen Golden Jewels (India) Pvt. Ltd. The petition also questioned the amendment extending the KVAT assessment limitation period, but the court declined relief and left the assessment orders undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1524 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375897</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging assessment orders under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, the validity of Kerala GST transitional saving provisions, and the continued jurisdiction to levy and collect KVAT after GST was dismissed in light of the Kerala HC judgment in M/s. Sheen Golden Jewels (India) Pvt. Ltd. The petition also questioned the amendment extending the KVAT assessment limitation period, but the court declined relief and left the assessment orders undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>