https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375890 Delay in filing the special leave petitions was condoned after the Court accepted the explanation offered for the delay. The Court then declined to interfere on merits, applying judicial restraint because the tax effect was below one crore and treating that low monetary stake as sufficient reason not to entertain the petitions. The special leave petitions were dismissed, and the pending applications were disposed of accordingly. en-us Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:58:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375890 Delay in filing the special leave petitions was condoned after the Court accepted the explanation offered for the delay. The Court then declined to interfere on merits, applying judicial restraint because the tax effect was below one crore and treating that low monetary stake as sufficient reason not to entertain the petitions. The special leave petitions were dismissed, and the pending applications were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375890