<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1514 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375887</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the re-assessment notice and related proceedings. It emphasized the importance of fulfilling disclosure duties and requiring concrete &#039;new material&#039; to justify reassessment under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the vague internet searches and information did not constitute material withheld during the original assessment, highlighting the necessity for thorough inquiries before reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1514 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375887</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the re-assessment notice and related proceedings. It emphasized the importance of fulfilling disclosure duties and requiring concrete &#039;new material&#039; to justify reassessment under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the vague internet searches and information did not constitute material withheld during the original assessment, highlighting the necessity for thorough inquiries before reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>