<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1500 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375873</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition without cost, citing the existence of a dispute between the parties and the failure of the Operational Creditor to provide specific details and proof of the claimed operational debt. The decision emphasized the importance of clear and specific particulars in applications under IBC, 2016, and the necessity of proper service of notices as per the prescribed rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:57:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1500 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375873</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition without cost, citing the existence of a dispute between the parties and the failure of the Operational Creditor to provide specific details and proof of the claimed operational debt. The decision emphasized the importance of clear and specific particulars in applications under IBC, 2016, and the necessity of proper service of notices as per the prescribed rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>