<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 15 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17015</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decision to tax the assessee at the maximum rate under section 164(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1974-75. The court found that the beneficiary was considered unknown and the shares indeterminate due to clauses in the settlement deed, justifying the application of the maximum tax rate. The court ruled against the assessee, affirming the decision of the Appellate Tribunal. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 16:03:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 15 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17015</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decision to tax the assessee at the maximum rate under section 164(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1974-75. The court found that the beneficiary was considered unknown and the shares indeterminate due to clauses in the settlement deed, justifying the application of the maximum tax rate. The court ruled against the assessee, affirming the decision of the Appellate Tribunal. No costs were awarded in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>