<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1494 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375867</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for Service Tax related to construction work for a specific client but set aside demands for services provided to government projects. Demands for services provided to commercial entities were partially upheld based on the taxable period. Penalties were modified proportionally, and interest was upheld for Service Tax short-paid. The matter was remanded for re-quantification of demands, interest, and penalties. The decision aimed to resolve the disputed tax liabilities comprehensively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:56:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1494 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375867</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for Service Tax related to construction work for a specific client but set aside demands for services provided to government projects. Demands for services provided to commercial entities were partially upheld based on the taxable period. Penalties were modified proportionally, and interest was upheld for Service Tax short-paid. The matter was remanded for re-quantification of demands, interest, and penalties. The decision aimed to resolve the disputed tax liabilities comprehensively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>