https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375858 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in five appeals challenging the denial of CENVAT credit and recovery of inadmissible credit under Rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, along with penalties. The appellants, engaged in manufacturing 'Piston Rings,' successfully argued that the 'Sole Selling Agent' services provided by another company qualified as 'input service' under CCR. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned order and allowing all appeals with consequential relief. en-us Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:56:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375858 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in five appeals challenging the denial of CENVAT credit and recovery of inadmissible credit under Rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, along with penalties. The appellants, engaged in manufacturing 'Piston Rings,' successfully argued that the 'Sole Selling Agent' services provided by another company qualified as 'input service' under CCR. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned order and allowing all appeals with consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375858