https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375850 The court upheld the penalty order against the petitioner, emphasizing the importance of pursuing available appellate remedies. The petitioner's challenge on grounds of merit and violation of natural justice was dismissed, with the court noting the continuation of adjudication process by the successor officer. While recognizing the petitioner's genuine pursuit of legal recourse, the court directed that time spent before the High Court would be excluded if the petitioner pursued the appellate remedy. en-us Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:55:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375850 The court upheld the penalty order against the petitioner, emphasizing the importance of pursuing available appellate remedies. The petitioner's challenge on grounds of merit and violation of natural justice was dismissed, with the court noting the continuation of adjudication process by the successor officer. While recognizing the petitioner's genuine pursuit of legal recourse, the court directed that time spent before the High Court would be excluded if the petitioner pursued the appellate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375850