<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1467 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375840</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes. It upheld the deduction under Section 10AA for trading activities but remanded the issue of interest receipts classification back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The Tribunal maintained its reliance on the previous decision for A.Y. 2011-12 in the assessee&#039;s case, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s arguments on this point.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 18:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1467 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375840</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes. It upheld the deduction under Section 10AA for trading activities but remanded the issue of interest receipts classification back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The Tribunal maintained its reliance on the previous decision for A.Y. 2011-12 in the assessee&#039;s case, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s arguments on this point.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>