<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1416 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278960</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi admitted additional evidence submitted by the appellant, including affidavits, confirmations, cheques, and bank account details. The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the AO for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need to afford the assessee a fair opportunity to be heard. The judgment underscored the importance of substantiating claims with concrete evidence and providing a fair opportunity for parties to present their case effectively before reaching a final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:50:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1416 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278960</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi admitted additional evidence submitted by the appellant, including affidavits, confirmations, cheques, and bank account details. The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the AO for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need to afford the assessee a fair opportunity to be heard. The judgment underscored the importance of substantiating claims with concrete evidence and providing a fair opportunity for parties to present their case effectively before reaching a final decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>