<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1249 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278957</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and fully allowed the appeal. It directed the AO to reconsider certain disallowances and deletions based on evidence and legal precedents. The Tribunal emphasized strict interpretation of deemed dividend provisions and recognized the genuine nature of the gift transactions and purchases involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:50:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1249 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278957</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and fully allowed the appeal. It directed the AO to reconsider certain disallowances and deletions based on evidence and legal precedents. The Tribunal emphasized strict interpretation of deemed dividend provisions and recognized the genuine nature of the gift transactions and purchases involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>