<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1728 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278972</link>
    <description>The Government upheld the rejection of rebate claims for service tax under Notification No. 41/2012 concerning commission agents&#039; services. Despite the applicant&#039;s arguments, it was determined that the services provided by commission agents did not extend beyond the factory premises as required by the notification&#039;s definition of &#039;specified services.&#039; The Government emphasized that the responsibility for export proceeds realization by the agents did not qualify as a service used beyond the factory, distinguishing them from cases where rebate was allowed for services such as transport and handling charges. Consequently, the rejection of rebate claims was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:50:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1728 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278972</link>
      <description>The Government upheld the rejection of rebate claims for service tax under Notification No. 41/2012 concerning commission agents&#039; services. Despite the applicant&#039;s arguments, it was determined that the services provided by commission agents did not extend beyond the factory premises as required by the notification&#039;s definition of &#039;specified services.&#039; The Government emphasized that the responsibility for export proceeds realization by the agents did not qualify as a service used beyond the factory, distinguishing them from cases where rebate was allowed for services such as transport and handling charges. Consequently, the rejection of rebate claims was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>