https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278982 The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the Assistant Commissioner's order, and directed the respondents to permit the petitioner to revise the returns for the assessment year 2015-16. The revision should be done in the presence of the assessing officer within four weeks of receiving the judgment. The company must comply with rule 22 of the KVAT Rules and pay any differential tax, interest, and penal interest simultaneously with the revision of the returns. No order on costs was made. en-us Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:50:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278982 The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the Assistant Commissioner's order, and directed the respondents to permit the petitioner to revise the returns for the assessment year 2015-16. The revision should be done in the presence of the assessing officer within four weeks of receiving the judgment. The company must comply with rule 22 of the KVAT Rules and pay any differential tax, interest, and penal interest simultaneously with the revision of the returns. No order on costs was made. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278982