https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278984 The Supreme Court upheld the legality of the land allotment to the Academy, emphasizing public interest and welfare considerations. It ruled that the Cabinet's decision to allot land was motivated by the urgency to relocate the school and educate students, not arbitrary. However, the Court found issue with the inadequate compensation for part of the allotted land, directing the Academy to pay for the gratuitous land at the prevailing rate with interest. The decision balanced public interest and constitutional principles, ensuring fairness and compliance with Article 14 of the Constitution of India. en-us Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Feb 2019 06:50:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278984 The Supreme Court upheld the legality of the land allotment to the Academy, emphasizing public interest and welfare considerations. It ruled that the Cabinet's decision to allot land was motivated by the urgency to relocate the school and educate students, not arbitrary. However, the Court found issue with the inadequate compensation for part of the allotted land, directing the Academy to pay for the gratuitous land at the prevailing rate with interest. The decision balanced public interest and constitutional principles, ensuring fairness and compliance with Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278984