https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278955 Judicial review of a municipal decision to entrust a self-financing pilot project for street signboards and direction boards was held to be limited to the decision-making process. The absence of a public tender or auction, by itself, did not render the arrangement arbitrary or illegal where the project was novel, had undergone experimentation and approvals, and imposed no financial burden on the Corporation. Interference was justified only for mala fides, arbitrariness, irrationality, procedural impropriety, or breach of constitutional or statutory limits. The statutory provisions invoked were found inapplicable to this self-financing arrangement, and the writ challenge was viewed as serving a private rather than genuine public interest. en-us Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jul 2024 11:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278955 Judicial review of a municipal decision to entrust a self-financing pilot project for street signboards and direction boards was held to be limited to the decision-making process. The absence of a public tender or auction, by itself, did not render the arrangement arbitrary or illegal where the project was novel, had undergone experimentation and approvals, and imposed no financial burden on the Corporation. Interference was justified only for mala fides, arbitrariness, irrationality, procedural impropriety, or breach of constitutional or statutory limits. The statutory provisions invoked were found inapplicable to this self-financing arrangement, and the writ challenge was viewed as serving a private rather than genuine public interest. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278955