<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 589 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278951</link>
    <description>Public land vested in a development authority had to be disposed of strictly under the statutory rules, and executive directions or cabinet decisions could not override that scheme. The commentary states that concessional transfer or lease was permitted only within the limited procedures in the rules, including prescribed modes of disposal and rule-based concessions, so directions for allotment dehors the rules were void. It also states that concessional allotment to a newspaper did not fall within the charitable purposes contemplated by the rules, which were directed to bodies such as hospitals, educational institutions, and orphanages. Such allotment was therefore impermissible and liable to be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:28:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 589 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278951</link>
      <description>Public land vested in a development authority had to be disposed of strictly under the statutory rules, and executive directions or cabinet decisions could not override that scheme. The commentary states that concessional transfer or lease was permitted only within the limited procedures in the rules, including prescribed modes of disposal and rule-based concessions, so directions for allotment dehors the rules were void. It also states that concessional allotment to a newspaper did not fall within the charitable purposes contemplated by the rules, which were directed to bodies such as hospitals, educational institutions, and orphanages. Such allotment was therefore impermissible and liable to be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>