https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278950 A tribunal under the West Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal Act could not treat a final civil court decree declaring title and injunction, in which the State was a party, as a nullity or ignore it for record-of-rights purposes; the decree had to be given effect and the record corrected accordingly. A stay of operation of a judgment striking down the vesting provision did not erase its precedential force, so the State could not continue vesting proceedings under an ultra vires provision without lawful compensation support. The impugned tribunal order and vesting action were set aside to the extent necessary. en-us Thu, 17 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Jan 2024 10:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278950 A tribunal under the West Bengal Land Reforms and Tenancy Tribunal Act could not treat a final civil court decree declaring title and injunction, in which the State was a party, as a nullity or ignore it for record-of-rights purposes; the decree had to be given effect and the record corrected accordingly. A stay of operation of a judgment striking down the vesting provision did not erase its precedential force, so the State could not continue vesting proceedings under an ultra vires provision without lawful compensation support. The impugned tribunal order and vesting action were set aside to the extent necessary. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278950