<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 921 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278948</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the special leave petition, ruling it was not maintainable as only the order from the review petition was challenged, not the main order. The Court held that once the review petition was dismissed, there was no merger, and the main order had to be challenged separately. Previous judgments were referenced to support this conclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:24:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=560009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 921 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278948</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the special leave petition, ruling it was not maintainable as only the order from the review petition was challenged, not the main order. The Court held that once the review petition was dismissed, there was no merger, and the main order had to be challenged separately. Previous judgments were referenced to support this conclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>