<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 1086 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278945</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the Director, Town and Country Planning, exceeded authority by issuing directions on clauses in agreements between owners and purchasers. The court found the impugned memo void and unenforceable, setting aside the Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment. It emphasized resolving private party contract disputes through proper legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 1086 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278945</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the Director, Town and Country Planning, exceeded authority by issuing directions on clauses in agreements between owners and purchasers. The court found the impugned memo void and unenforceable, setting aside the Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment. It emphasized resolving private party contract disputes through proper legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>