<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 51 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16999</link>
    <description>Section 33(1)(o) of the Estate Duty Act operates only where the property is already chargeable to estate duty under the Act&#039;s charging provisions. The gifts made by the deceased were not shown to fall within sections 8, 9 or 10, so the gifted amount was not brought within the estate duty charge. As a result, the exemption question did not arise and section 33(1)(o) was held inapplicable on the facts, with the reference answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:21:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 51 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16999</link>
      <description>Section 33(1)(o) of the Estate Duty Act operates only where the property is already chargeable to estate duty under the Act&#039;s charging provisions. The gifts made by the deceased were not shown to fall within sections 8, 9 or 10, so the gifted amount was not brought within the estate duty charge. As a result, the exemption question did not arise and section 33(1)(o) was held inapplicable on the facts, with the reference answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>