https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375824 Article explains that Article 226 relief cannot compel allotment of public property at an outdated concessional rate when the governing statutory rules require disposal through a prescribed and transparent process at the prevailing rate. It also states that parity under Article 14 is unavailable where there is no identically placed comparator and no fresh lease deed, regularisation, or finalised benefit in the other matters. The noted principle is that negative equality cannot be used to secure an illegality or an incomplete benefit, and public assets must be dealt with strictly in accordance with the applicable rules. en-us Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:23:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375824 Article explains that Article 226 relief cannot compel allotment of public property at an outdated concessional rate when the governing statutory rules require disposal through a prescribed and transparent process at the prevailing rate. It also states that parity under Article 14 is unavailable where there is no identically placed comparator and no fresh lease deed, regularisation, or finalised benefit in the other matters. The noted principle is that negative equality cannot be used to secure an illegality or an incomplete benefit, and public assets must be dealt with strictly in accordance with the applicable rules. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375824