https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375824 Mandamus under Article 226 requires a legally enforceable right and a corresponding statutory duty; it cannot compel allotment of public property at a concessional or outdated rate contrary to prescribed, transparent disposal rules. Equality under Article 14 does not create negative equality: parity requires an identically situated comparator with a completed and legally crystallised benefit. Uncompleted allotment or regularisation processes involving other entities cannot justify similar relief. Property may therefore be dealt with under the applicable statutory rules and prevailing procedure. en-us Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:23:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375824 Mandamus under Article 226 requires a legally enforceable right and a corresponding statutory duty; it cannot compel allotment of public property at a concessional or outdated rate contrary to prescribed, transparent disposal rules. Equality under Article 14 does not create negative equality: parity requires an identically situated comparator with a completed and legally crystallised benefit. Uncompleted allotment or regularisation processes involving other entities cannot justify similar relief. Property may therefore be dealt with under the applicable statutory rules and prevailing procedure. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375824