https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375820 The court allowed the writ petitions challenging the State Tax Officer's reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) based on a website report for the period 2013-14. It emphasized that when original invoices were produced, no reversal of ITC was justified. The court highlighted procedural issues and called for a centralized mechanism to address discrepancies effectively. The impugned orders were set aside, and the matters were remanded for fresh examination, emphasizing a fair and reasonable procedure for ITC claims. The judgment aimed to ensure accountability of defaulting dealers through a holistic approach. en-us Mon, 11 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:23:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375820 The court allowed the writ petitions challenging the State Tax Officer's reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) based on a website report for the period 2013-14. It emphasized that when original invoices were produced, no reversal of ITC was justified. The court highlighted procedural issues and called for a centralized mechanism to address discrepancies effectively. The impugned orders were set aside, and the matters were remanded for fresh examination, emphasizing a fair and reasonable procedure for ITC claims. The judgment aimed to ensure accountability of defaulting dealers through a holistic approach. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 11 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375820