<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1442 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375815</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision treating commercial income from the sale of hybrid seeds as agricultural income exempt under Section 10(1) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2006-07. Additionally, the Court affirmed the allocation of corporate expenses between two units based on a scientific basis, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument against the allocation method. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as it did not raise any substantial question of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:23:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1442 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375815</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision treating commercial income from the sale of hybrid seeds as agricultural income exempt under Section 10(1) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2006-07. Additionally, the Court affirmed the allocation of corporate expenses between two units based on a scientific basis, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument against the allocation method. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as it did not raise any substantial question of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>