<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1433 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375806</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to admit additional evidence and delete various additions made by the AO. The CIT(A) found that the assessee had proven the legitimacy of transactions and income sources, leading to the deletion of substantial amounts totaling over Rs. 5 crores. The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals filed by the Revenue, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s findings that the additions lacked evidentiary support and were not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:22:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1433 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375806</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to admit additional evidence and delete various additions made by the AO. The CIT(A) found that the assessee had proven the legitimacy of transactions and income sources, leading to the deletion of substantial amounts totaling over Rs. 5 crores. The Tribunal dismissed all three appeals filed by the Revenue, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s findings that the additions lacked evidentiary support and were not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>