<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1420 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375793</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant on the refund of interest paid on service tax. However, the refund claim was restricted by the amount of cenvat credit attributed to non-taxable output service, in accordance with Rule 6.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:22:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1420 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375793</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant on the refund of interest paid on service tax. However, the refund claim was restricted by the amount of cenvat credit attributed to non-taxable output service, in accordance with Rule 6.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>