<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1407 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375780</link>
    <description>Transitional refund claims pending in appeal when GST commenced were to be dealt with under the GST transition framework, and the stated position is that such amounts should be refunded in cash rather than re-credited to the cenvat account. The analysis turns on the treatment of pre-GST credit claims decided after the new regime came into force, with the operative effect being that re-credit was not the correct mode of refund. On that basis, the direction for re-credit was set aside and cash refund was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 07:21:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1407 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375780</link>
      <description>Transitional refund claims pending in appeal when GST commenced were to be dealt with under the GST transition framework, and the stated position is that such amounts should be refunded in cash rather than re-credited to the cenvat account. The analysis turns on the treatment of pre-GST credit claims decided after the new regime came into force, with the operative effect being that re-credit was not the correct mode of refund. On that basis, the direction for re-credit was set aside and cash refund was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>