<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1268 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278920</link>
    <description>The Tribunal invoked Section 80 to waive penalties imposed on the appellant, finding their activities did not align with typical cable operator functions. Relying on precedents and statutory definitions, the Tribunal concluded the appellant&#039;s role as an intermediary did not warrant penalties. The penalties were set aside, allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:53:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1268 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278920</link>
      <description>The Tribunal invoked Section 80 to waive penalties imposed on the appellant, finding their activities did not align with typical cable operator functions. Relying on precedents and statutory definitions, the Tribunal concluded the appellant&#039;s role as an intermediary did not warrant penalties. The penalties were set aside, allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>