<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1283 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278919</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 3,71,19,888, as the Revenue failed to prove suppressed sale consideration. The ITAT emphasized the burden of proof on the Revenue and dismissed their appeal, citing lack of concrete evidence to support the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:53:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1283 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278919</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 3,71,19,888, as the Revenue failed to prove suppressed sale consideration. The ITAT emphasized the burden of proof on the Revenue and dismissed their appeal, citing lack of concrete evidence to support the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>