<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1654 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278937</link>
    <description>The Revision Application challenging the rejection of a rebate claim for Excise duty on exported goods was allowed by the Government. It was found that availing drawback of duty does not disqualify from claiming rebate under relevant notifications. The lower authorities&#039; failure to comply with a previous government order and their misapplication of Drawback Rules were highlighted, leading to a breach of judicial discipline. The Government emphasized that availing rebate and drawback are governed by separate rules, and the decision to reject the appeal based on Drawback Rules conditions was deemed erroneous. The order-in-appeal was set aside, and the Revision Application was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 23:53:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1654 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278937</link>
      <description>The Revision Application challenging the rejection of a rebate claim for Excise duty on exported goods was allowed by the Government. It was found that availing drawback of duty does not disqualify from claiming rebate under relevant notifications. The lower authorities&#039; failure to comply with a previous government order and their misapplication of Drawback Rules were highlighted, leading to a breach of judicial discipline. The Government emphasized that availing rebate and drawback are governed by separate rules, and the decision to reject the appeal based on Drawback Rules conditions was deemed erroneous. The order-in-appeal was set aside, and the Revision Application was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>