https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278912 The High Court affirmed the District Judge's decision, stating that the burden of proof regarding the nominal nature of the mortgage deed and lack of consideration lay with the Plaintiff challenging the alienation. The Court found that the Plaintiff failed to establish the falsity of the recitals in the mortgage deed, especially in the absence of their father's testimony. As a result, the appeal was dismissed with costs. en-us Tue, 09 Aug 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Feb 2019 17:42:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278912 The High Court affirmed the District Judge's decision, stating that the burden of proof regarding the nominal nature of the mortgage deed and lack of consideration lay with the Plaintiff challenging the alienation. The Court found that the Plaintiff failed to establish the falsity of the recitals in the mortgage deed, especially in the absence of their father's testimony. As a result, the appeal was dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 09 Aug 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278912