https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278909 The High Court ruled in favor of defendants 1 and 2, upholding the trial court's decision. It determined the disputed property as self-acquired based on credible evidence, dismissing the plaintiffs' claim of ancestral status. The sale deed, deemed valid, transferred ownership to defendants 1 and 2 upon execution and registration, irrespective of consideration, as per the Transfer of Property Act. Legal necessity for the sale was deemed irrelevant in light of the property's self-acquired nature. The plaintiffs' suit was dismissed, and the lower appellate court's judgment was overturned. en-us Fri, 07 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Feb 2019 17:14:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278909 The High Court ruled in favor of defendants 1 and 2, upholding the trial court's decision. It determined the disputed property as self-acquired based on credible evidence, dismissing the plaintiffs' claim of ancestral status. The sale deed, deemed valid, transferred ownership to defendants 1 and 2 upon execution and registration, irrespective of consideration, as per the Transfer of Property Act. Legal necessity for the sale was deemed irrelevant in light of the property's self-acquired nature. The plaintiffs' suit was dismissed, and the lower appellate court's judgment was overturned. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 07 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278909