<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1391 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375764</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the ITAT&#039;s decision to remit the matter back to the AO for fresh adjudication. The Court found no substantial question of law arising from the appeal, affirming the need for detailed verification and consistency with previous Tribunal decisions. The valuation of encroached/litigated land must reflect its actual status and cannot be uniformly set at NIL without proper examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 13:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1391 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375764</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the ITAT&#039;s decision to remit the matter back to the AO for fresh adjudication. The Court found no substantial question of law arising from the appeal, affirming the need for detailed verification and consistency with previous Tribunal decisions. The valuation of encroached/litigated land must reflect its actual status and cannot be uniformly set at NIL without proper examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>