<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1386 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375759</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s refilling and relabeling activities do not amount to manufacture. The Commissioner&#039;s reclassification without basis was deemed impermissible, and the appellant was not required to reverse the credit of CVD. The extended period of limitation did not apply, and no penalty was imposed. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 13:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1386 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375759</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s refilling and relabeling activities do not amount to manufacture. The Commissioner&#039;s reclassification without basis was deemed impermissible, and the appellant was not required to reverse the credit of CVD. The extended period of limitation did not apply, and no penalty was imposed. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>